No, mainly because if you sort posts by new here it’s in large majority nothing anyone I know wants to see, and I don’t want them to think that’s what I’m here for.
No, mainly because if you sort posts by new here it’s in large majority nothing anyone I know wants to see, and I don’t want them to think that’s what I’m here for.
I’m spitballing for a conversation. I don’t think I’m a pivotal strategic player.
Edit: that said, I do think what you said is certainly worth mention, so I want to get ahead of my defensiveness.
So to continue, do you think that such a tactic would be valuable for a state funded interest?
Unfortunately there’s no version of politics without gaming. Merit is clearly not enough to win alone, however I do believe all things being equal the participants with stronger merit are more resilient against the games.
I have no problem taking flack for it. In my view they’re so far off base that a flurry of unforced errors unravel with every variable.
Dying from all causes sounds like a really rough last page.
I agree, LLMs have been helpful in pointing me in the right direction and helping me rethink what questions I actually want to ask in disciplines I’m not very familiar with.
Women are you going to be able to get the kids to go to the store?
Agree, and the point I always want to make is that any LLM or neural net or any other AI tech is going to be a mere component in a powerful product, rather than the entirety of the product.
The way I think of it is that my brain is of little value without my body, and my person is of little value without my team at work. I don’t exist in a vacuum but I can be highly productive within my environment.
From a business perspective, no shareholder cares at how good an employee is at personally achieving a high degree of skill. They only care about selling and earning, and to a lesser degree an enduring reputation for longer term earnings.
Economics could very well drive this forward. But I don’t think the craft will be lost. People will need to supervise this progress as well as collaborate with the machines to extend its capabilities and dictate its purposes.
I couldn’t tell you if we’re talking on a time scale of months or decades, but I do think “we” will get there.
I’m my experience they do a decent job of whipping out mindless minutea and things that are well known patterns in very popular languages.
They do not solve problems.
I think for an “AI” product to be truly useful at writing code it would need to incorporate the LLM as a mere component, with something facilitating checks through static analysis and maybe some other technologies, maybe even mulling the result through a loop over the components until they’re all satisfied before finally delivering it to the user as a proposal.
I’m pretty sure they undeleted mine and my whole account
Pluggin’
Damn if that wasn’t a resurrection of the most forgotten memory.
I see someone has never worked in telecom
Like all the other sounds that come out of your face, what could be up with it?
Before Machine Learning, it meant Meta Language to me
I always use my ssh server for remote code execution.
NC deck could be cool but I found it really disappointing.
Having people willing to say good thing about you is a signal.
There are people who I would not be surprised if they are unable to produce quality references, and I would be ok with not having the opportunity to work with them.
They aren’t even ugly, they’re just beautiful in a different way than media accepts.