17 year old Tech enthusiast and Cat lover from Germany.

I’m almost positive I’m autistic and/or have ADHD.

Lemm.ee account of @[email protected]

  • 0 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 17th, 2023

help-circle

  • rush@lemm.eetoLinux@lemmy.mlis Zorin OS any good?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It recommends new users to just install everything with it, instead of looking for native alternatives.

    There’s actually the “Zorin-exec-guard”, which runs when you wanna use an AppImage (for integration) or windows app and tries to match the filename to a known list of either native versions of the program or native alternatives. It then prompts you if you wanna use those instead.

    They’ve also released a migration tool for a future Z16 > Z17 migration and migration between Core & Pro.

    Another thing, the extensions and everything needed for pro layouts is all in the repos but disabled by default. You can all enable it manually.



  • If OSTree suits you better, that’s fine!

    The A/B Partition method and OSTree are both great, but have different strengths

    VanillaOS described it in their FAQ once:

    Vanilla OS uses an A/B structure (ABRoot), which transacts updates atomically between two root micro partitions. The benefits of this system are the guarantee that the system is altered only when the entire transaction is successful (concept of atomicity), furthermore, the double root partition structure allows you to roll back to the previous state, directly from your boot, you will always have a home to come back to.

    This structure, unlike others, is compatible with already existing distributions and does not require a complex setup and allows easy re-initialization of the system without data loss.


  • The 40gb total are both already reserved, and a normal user isn’t supposed to modify it so it shouldn’t fill up.

    For desktop apps, Vanilla will primarily stick to Flatpaks, so Firefox will also be a Flatpak.

    VanillaOS already has a custom boot menu that can be used to switch slots in case an update went wrong, so that you can go back to your older, but working system.

    The partitions are also not synced.

    If you install something using abroot (e.g an update) it will only be installed to the unused slot. So if you run abroot --update or use the included updater, and you’re in Slot A, it’ll modify Slot B, and vice versa.




  • Technically, only apt exists, as per Debian. The filesystem is ext4 but with two system partitions, so that you:

    • have one backup partition
    • can install updates to the unused partition for seemless and atomic updates
    • Be immutable whilst offering easy updates

    It gets compared to NixOS because NixOS is also an immutable distribution and the package manager is equally as flexible as apx (even tho apx also allows you to use nix)

    Multiple package managers outside of apt/dpkg from Debian get managed automatically using the apx tool, only if you wish to use it. Otherwise, for the desktop they promote the use of Flatpaks or AppImages.



  • rush@lemm.eetoLinux@lemmy.mlWhy I dislike snaps
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    that’s really just two differences:

    • weaker separation/sandboxing (process is granted permission to everything) (mostly bad with handy usecases)
    • an alias feature for binaries contained in packages so you don’t have to run them by ID







  • I’d wager a guess and say Debian is probably used on servers more than desktops. I’d wager another guess and say that for server applications many are actually fine with snap

    as such, I bring forth the theory that snapd is a popular package on Debian due to it’s widespread use on servers, not because tons of people are running bare Debian on their desktops and preferring snaps.

    We need more data to say anything about the desktop.