“Oh, he uses FOSS, that’s even worse. Put him on the commie watch list”
Came here to say this, but I was delayed by having to clean my cargo target folder.
Honestly, this article is pretty bad at explaining the problem here. It’s clear that other websites will try to track you, but the important part of this incognito drama is this:
The plaintiffs also accused Google of taking Chrome users’ private browsing activity and then associating it with their already-existing user profiles.
100% code coverage, integration tests passing. Deploys to prod. NullPointerException at 3am
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
The fun thing most of these games aren’t even truly capitalist. City builders like Cities Skylines, Tropico and Anno have little or no free market and you’re just in control of a centralized planned economy.
The only truly capitalist games I saw on that list are X4 and Offworld Trading Company since you play as a single private owner competing with others on the market.
He wrote a techno optimist manifesto that reads like a proto fascist manifesto. In fact, he cites Marinetti as an inspiration, who was founder of the futurist movement, and later author of the fascist manifesto and a close supporter of Mussolini, so no surprise I guess. He enforces ideas that this century is just a bad rerun of the previous.
https://www.disconnect.blog/p/the-religion-of-techno-optimism
I wouldn’t be surprised if the board is just doing what ChatGPT tells them to.
This is not a slight nuance, it literally makes touchscreen unusable for me. Touchscreen really helps with carpal tunnel and RSI, which is more important to me than an ideological war against Google.
The deceleration is way too low and it’s hard to get it to focus where I want on the page fast. The deceleration is inconsistent between touchscreen and touchpad, which works fine. I tried looking around for configurations for it but couldn’t find any. Touchscreen support in Chrome is just generally better
Does this apply to all Chromium based browsers? I would like to switch to Firefox, but the touchscreen scroll there is terrible, and that is 90% of what I do in a browser.
There is actually a C+, also called “orthodox” C++ https://gist.github.com/bkaradzic/2e39896bc7d8c34e042b
Hey you can’t use Jira, means you can get some real work done
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
https://github.com/unocss/unocss is the spiritual successor to windy. Some of the devs are the same
Every front-end styling dev can now speak the same language, rather than constructing their own from scratch.
Ok, but with Tailwind it seems that they are just saying p-4 uppercase
instead of padding: 1rem; text-transform: uppercase;
which is shorter, but exactly the same thing since it maps 1:1 to ‘custom’ CSS. It also doesn’t abstract away the CSS underneath, it just gives it a new name, which you have to learn in addition to the CSS
Tailwind compilers should only bring in the classes that you’re using, so it should be much smaller than almost any other framework.
In theory yes, but in practice look at the link in my original post for how it becomes slow with hot reloading in Vite. I don’t know if it would have the same problem with leptos, but probably yes, since it is an architectural flaw of generate the world, strip it down later.
DaisyUI is useful because it has helper classes
I do get DaisyUI, and it does fulfill the goal of getting devs to speak the same language. <button class="btn btn-primary">
totally makes sense. What I don’t get is why couple and build it on top of Tailwind which becomes useless at this point, since it’s just shorthand for some CSS. Maybe I am missing some big feature of Tailwind? Quoting the creator of Tailwind from the main page
So he is clearly against the approach that DaisyUI advertises as a selling point.
The famous Mediterranean diet did not include the ridiculous amount of meat and animal products that are so common today.
It looks nice, but you have to sign up for an account to use a terminal app? This is really getting ridiculous