To be fair, those failed because capitalists took charge claiming to be socialists. Not saying there is a surefire way to prevent that from happening every time.

LSD and psylocibin work very similarly, they even have cross-tolerance. Schizophrenia and psychosis are some of the few risks you need to watch out for when handling psychedelics. If there is a predisposition present like mental illlnesses running in the family, psychedelics may act as a trigger for those and should be avoided or handled very carefully.

Also there is no documented overdose with LSD and psylocybe mushrooms either, even with doses as high as hundreds or thousands of recreational doses.

Very well said, thank you.

The fact that psychedelic drugs like mushrooms and LSD aren’t as dangerous as media and politics make them out to be.

They are actually among the physically safest drugs out there, even when including caffeine and sugar. They can be used in so many ways for self-improvement and treating depressions, anxiety, PTSD and many other conditions.

The book ‘How to change your Mind’ by Michael Pollan is a wonderful read on the topic.

Sure, not-13-year-old-kid-trying-to-sound-cool

If those are the qualities you seek in a partner, I am deeply sorry for you.

Probably, and I think I am missing the same thing.

Im a gamer and only use a desktop. I dont see why I would use a laptop additionally.

Its the troll again…

Yeah ur not 20 tho…

Sorry, could someone explain this to me?

You didnt even read my comment, did you? Also, you should do some research about carbon credits if youre gonna start a discussion about them because it seems you dont really know what those are

Yeah definitely, but the number of people working from home rose immensely thanks to covid, before it was more or less unthinkable. I think in the next few years there will be some major changes regarding work conditions, lets hope for the best.

Anyway, final thought on carbon credits: I didnt mean to imply that the majority or even the average program behind carbon credits is beneficial, and I dont think it is relevant for the point from my first comment. OPs suggestion was buying carbon credits for additional impact, and as long as you do that correctly (i.e. buying those that are beneficial) it helps and is not greenwashing.

I did some research into the matter a few months back. Before, I held the same prejudices and have only heard carbon credits were a way for companies to keep polluting without consequences. While it is true that carbon credits get misused for that, doesnt mean all carbon credits are like that.

There are a lot of projects that get monitored appropriately and prove their actual impact. There are principles like additionality, permanence, singularity by which you can judge if a given project is actually beneficial.

Tree planting initiatives for example dont satisfy the permanence principle and are therefore not considered effective for carbon compensation.

Your last sentence definitely holds true, but not all emissions are evitable, like I need to live in a home with heating, some people need to drive to work. People in developing countries cant even afford to think about reducing their emissions. Additional measures for reducing emissions are definitely necessary. Unfortunately the current regulations for those are too vulnerable to exploitation.

What you are talking about is the way companies act using carbon credit to prevent actually taking measures against climate change. It has nothing to do with carbon credits themselves Thats like saying water is bad because someone somewhere posioned a river.

There are a lot of reputable climate programs that actually provably reduce co2 emissions by the claimed amounts, and Im not talking about ‘Ill give you 100$ to not burn 1t of co2 so you burn it tomorrow’ projects. If I as a private person buy 10t of carbon credit, that doesnt mean I have to burn 10t of CO2 before.

How couls any of those be labeled greenwashing if the goal is a complete list of possible actions?

Yeah some dont have a huge impact like esim and ecosia, but theyre the better alternatives to things we use anyway.

Carbon labels would make a huge difference, I dont know what you mean there.

Carbon credits are used for greenwashing, because most are not regulated and monitored strictly enough. That doesnt mean carbon credits in general are greenwashing. Buying reputable ones with actual impact definitely helps.

Its sad that many people are kept from donating by the myth that ‘it doesnt help anyway’ or ‘theyre just gonna keep my money’. Sure if you just donate wherever, chances are your money is not used efficiently, but there are a lot of organizations that are reputable and efficient, you just need to do a little research

U alright bud?

Why did you ruin it with the ‘AI scary :,(’ propaganda bs

That poor kid. How tf can anyone be that thin? Probably weighs like 20kg

Imagine being inside a month😵‍💫