I used to as well until I looked into it, which is why I now know way, way more than anyone really needs to (there is… a lot.) Anyway, figured I’d explain just in case. You didn’t seem like you had bad intentions, so thanks for being understanding.
I used to as well until I looked into it, which is why I now know way, way more than anyone really needs to (there is… a lot.) Anyway, figured I’d explain just in case. You didn’t seem like you had bad intentions, so thanks for being understanding.
A furry is someone that identifies with anthropomorphic animal characters (or sometimes just animal characteristics). No dressing up required. Now, a lot of the people that go to cons tend to have more money, so you will see more fursuits and such, but most furries do not dress up.
You are right, but a lot of the roots of furry criticism do tend to be queerphobic in origin. It’s just something to recognize.
I’m using kink in a pretty generic way because a lot of the criticisms of furries relate to sex (e.g. beastiality or pedophilia), and thus any depiction of kink (like bondage gear) is used to demonize them that it’s a fetish (and one that is coming for your children.)
There is a significantly higher proportion of LGBTQ+ representation within the furry community than the general populace, and it makes sense why. Fursonas are another way to explore sexual and gender identities in a safe way, and furry communities tend to be pretty accepting places.
This is just my opinion, but I see kink in the furry community criticized the same way I see kink at Pride events criticized.
Make sure you take your dog’s shoes off, too.
I’m not trans, but I do know how to read medical studies that all disagree with you. I suppose reading isn’t a specialty of yours, or you wouldn’t add good day to the end of your posts while parroting bigoted talking points.
Anyway, you are correct that you are a transphobe, so I’m glad you admit it. That is always the first step.
Have a good day.
You are confidently explaining being trans wrong to someone who literally explained trans completely correct, and you look incredibly silly.
Being trans is not exclusively the opposite of your genetic sex. Being trans is not identifying as your assigned gender at birth. This includes non-binary people, and also doesn’t exclude intersex people, who wouldn’t fit into your definition, since the gender binary doesn’t have an apt comparison, especially because we assign genders based on our genitals (which, again, may not correlate to our genetic sex!)
The point is that gender is technically kinda arbitrary, and it affects more things beyond one of each of these can make a baby.
True. Happy holidays was accidentally inclusive, as opposed to it being designed that way. It was just used as another way to say Merry Christmas.
Asking “Why would you do X?” implies heavily that had they not done X, the situation wouldn’t have happened. It is victim blaming.
1 in 6 people are effectively homeless, lol, now let me use my refridgerator to cook.
So, again, you still don’t agree, but said you agree, which is a lie, so how can I believe anything you say when you don’t post sources?
So, how can you say you agree when you literally didn’t watch it, and if you had, you would literally know you don’t agree.
The answer to your question is food deserts.
You can make it even cheaper by securing yourself a parcel of unclaimed land, stealing some animals, building a small shack, and then growing all the vegetables yourself!
A cheeseburger from McDonald’s is $2 × 3 = $6. You can buy a large fries for $3 and split it. Steal handfuls of ketchup and salt. $9 to feed your family of three. You can even buy a large soda and split it, ya bourgeoisie fuck, and it took you no energy or time to cook it, instead of the 1+ hour it took to make yours.
But you just said you don’t agree with him.
I’m not sure I understand how that applies here or changes what I posted.