• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you think the right to own a gun is more real than the right to drive a car?

    Yes. One is part of our constitution, and is recognized as fundamental to having freedom at all. The other is convenient and necessary for modern life in the US, but the need could be eliminated through appropriate public policy.

    I argue that the moral and ethical right comes from the right to defend your own life (and the lives of others) and freedom, with violence if necessary. If you accept that you have that right, then accepting that people have the right to use the most effective tool for that is a reasonable conclusion. Some countries do not recognize that the individual has the right to defend themselves; those countries tend to also prevent citizens from owning pepper spray and tasers, since those can both be lethal.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could make an argument that travel is a fundamental right, and if you accept that the most effective tool comes with the right then access to a car becomes a right.

      I don’t know if I accept that having a right also means you have the right to the most effective tools to execute it. You have the right to speech but airwaves are restricted. Many places have laws limiting noise made in the early morning.

      Some of that probably comes from recognizing that you may have the right to talk about how great Widgets are, I have the right to sleep at night.

      You might have the right to defend yourself, but I want the right to not live in mortal fear because that guy carries a fully automatic gun on the bus I need to take.