• BillDoor@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t true at all. IQ isn’t some magical catch-all measure of a person’s intellectual ability, but it’s not entirely total quackery either.

    I suspect that academic success would be very strongly correlated with having a supportive home life, but IQ not so much. Maybe the gifted kids you refer to were the academically successful ones and not the high-IQ ones?

    • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They once had me take one of those horoscopes and one part of it was a rorschach test. How is that not quakery.

      Another part was to have me write a short text wich fair enough.

      fill in mulltiple choise questions that were deliveratly obtuse and ambigous.

      The only part that i would expect to corrrelaete with intelligence was when i had to memorize a string of numbers and repeat it after a while. But even then this is an ability you can train.

            • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You are the one trying to start shit here. If you had a more nuanced response. In this case, an example would be descriving your experience. You would get a more nuanced response. See the other guy.

              But im glat i touched a sore spot for you.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                All I did was say I took an IQ test that didn’t have any of the elements in yours. You came back calling me stupid.

                Elaborate on how I started shit with you. Explain yourself. How the fuck do you envision yourself as being justified. How the fuck do you explain your perception of me starting shit with you.

                • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I posted several patagraphs you respond with a onliner i respond with a onliner because thats what you deserve.

                  Aparently it really aplies to you or you wouldnt be this mad. Im guess im sorry you ferl insecure about your intelligence.

      • BillDoor@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You won’t find any of those things in any reputable IQ test. I’d be surprised if you found them even in a bullshit online test.

        Maybe you just had a particularly bad experience and it has given you a false impression of what an IQ test is.

      • s0ykaf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        IQ is bullshit in the sense that as a measurement of cognitive abilities it doesn’t really work, but that doesn’t mean the only factor influencing intelligence is social upbringing either

        i mean, say what you will, but i could have the most supportive environment on earth and i’m pretty sure i wouldn’t ever be the second coming of messi (or michael jordan for you gringos), same should go for newton, knorozov or whoever

        • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course. Humans are not clones. As long as they are not there is some variance due to physiological inherited factors.

          That being said a lot of intelligence can be trained.

          And a lot of it is culturally loaded. Im sure the average paleolithic hunter gatherer was smarter than me because they have to constantly solve complex problems. While people today rely on civilization to take on the load.

          We dont actually do t need to be that intelligent know a days. And actually very few people relly care about it. For example there is some disiese going around that has about 7% chance of leaving you mentally handicapped. And you can catch it reapeatedly. No one really cares. Because they never came to a situation were their inherent intelligence was the bottleneck to solve a problem. Once eventually everyone loses 10or 20% of their intelligence they will still be fine.

          So most of these asholes going woe is me im so samart. 1-Are not really that smart. 2-inherent phisiological limitations to cognitive avility have never been an actual limitation in their lives.

          The iq is bullshit in the sense the the tests are bullshit. Only the part testing working memory relates to those innate charachteristics.