On the side bar it lists the following:

  • [Matrix/Element]Dead
  • Discord

“Discord” is an active link, but the Matrix link is completely inactive. Not only is it inactive (which could have be excused as a broken link), but it is also manually labeled as “Dead”, as if there is no intention of making it work. How can a community that is focused on privacy willingly favor a service that is privacy non-respecting when a perfectly functional privacy-respecting alternative exists?

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    192
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the timeless debate between accessibility and exclusivity. Do you want more people in your community by compromising some values? Or would you rather be a hardliner but never reach those people?

    Most of the time you have to pick somewhere on that spectrum. It’s a question of pragmatism and utilitarianism.

    Does it do more good for lots of people to be slightly more privacy-aware, or is it better to have a very small portion of the population that are super privacy-aware?

    You have to decide, and the debate rages on all the time.

      • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, really? So you think Matrix is the ultimate form of secure and private “chat” communities? Because if it is not then it is a compromise.

        This Lemmy instance for sure as hell is not the most private and secure.

          • NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree with you. I don’t understand why people are arguing that something less developed or stable is a valid reason to use something like discord, a widely anti privacy focused platform; to discuss privacy related topics.

            You can argue that it’s more stable but the cost is shepherding users into a platform they might think is secure by promoting it. In my opinion that’s worse because it lulls uneducated users into a false sense of security by having the community use and engage with each other there. The implication alone might cause some people not to second guess it since it’s supported by the community and that’s a problem for me personally.

          • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Never used it but I can imagine it being better. Discord is annoying as hell. Point was that the commenter seemed to argue that you should not accept any compromises, which seems silly to me.

          • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That depends on your threat model. All lemmy posts are publicly visible and can be scooped up by Farcebook, google et al. Discord is very definitely not properly private but all posts aren’t public. They are undoubtedly doing the same thing FB does and selling a semi anonymised set of meta data about you, but the world doesn’t have direct visibility

            I know the three letter acronyms have access to everything I do, hidden or not, I don’t like it but I don’t see anyway around it.

            I can however do my level best to keep FB, google, M$ out of my stuff to some extent

            • I dunno. The comment doesn’t have the word in it now; that’s why #1981 is important. But, maybe they didn’t and I imagined it.

              It remains true that not all compromises are equal, and the privacy compromises we make for Discord are relatively large compared to the ones for Matrix.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                There is an “edited” indicator for posts, and the post you’re referring to doesn’t have it.

                Sure, your point is true, but you were (incorrectly) accusing the other commenter of skipping a qualifier that would make your point relevant.

                • You’re right; Voyager doesn’t show the “edited” flag.

                  I was mistaken about the word, and the accusation about skipping over it was unwarrented.

                  I think this is missing the point by arguing semantics, but my phrasing was wrong.

      • RQG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not compromising at all would be not using the internet though. Probably live in a cottage somewhere in the middle of nowhere too.

      • RovingFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people that need a topic to be promoted are the people outside of the topic. A place where privacy and non privacy focused individuals can meet is needed to atract and teach new users.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We all compromise somewhere, it’s just a question of where the line is. Even Richard Stallman makes concessions for things like Firmware and hardware being closed source.

    • Hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want a nicely bridget matrix - discord channel, so that the individuals of the community can choose themselves

      • TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is this more accessible? Have you read the installation instructions? How would someone that has no IT background even manage to configure this? Even just grabbing a binary from the releases page is complicated for a lot of people.

    • Enigma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you able to at least bridge you matrix to the discord? You should, at the very least, be able to do that while also promoting matrix.

      • whale@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The irony of this is that instead of dealing with a sketchy privacy policy(/ies) with Matrix versus a terrible privacy policy with Discord, bridging gives you the worst of both worlds, and all user data is open wide to total violation by the worst of both policies combined.

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ehh not really; at least if you care about your own anonymity. Sure the communication is as private as the weakest link (or less because now you have to trust the bot relaying it, too), but nobody from Discord would be able to easily look up your identity.

          • whale@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess it depends what you mean by your identity. I would totally buy the idea that Discord identifies you in some nearly personal capacity, because they seem to either want your IP address or a phone number to verify you as an individual. But I would say that having all your messages up on their servers is approximately just as bad. And obviously, Matrix bridges can’t encrypt your messages so they’re sitting on at least one Matrix server with similar access to your identity…

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes there are bridge bots. But discord breaks them, and bands their accounts. Sometimes

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      In addition to adoption, it takes time for the usability to catch up.

      Right now Signal is just as good (IMO better) as Messenger usability wise, but that wasn’t always there.

      Matrix needs some time to iron out those issues

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree to an extent, but usability is not a sufficient condition for mass adoption. I think Lemmy for end users is just as usable as Reddit was, at least for me it is. But people don’t want to leave their communities.

        That’s why personally I have a Discord still. There are too many communities I am an active part of on there to abandon Discord outright. Plus all of my friends and family are on there, and I’ve already approached some them about switching and they all have said the same thing I just did.

        I wasn’t ever super invested in Reddit, so it was easy for me to abandon it for Lemmy, and I vastly prefer the communities here. Discord though is a different story for now, unfortunately.

    • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you want more people in your community by compromising some values? Or would you rather be a hardliner but never reach those people?

      Is there any reason you couldn’t have a discord and a matrix channel? It seems to me that would reach the most people.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue becomes moderation at that point, not a big problem for a larger community, but small communities tend to struggle with moderation with just one hub of communications.

        Also, the hardliners wouldn’t be interested in co-existing, that’s against their ethics generally.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You also split your intended audience and every discussion. It’s one of the big issues with Lemmy and federation right now. People create multiple copies of the same community across different servers.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah it quickly becomes a dick measuring contest and shunning people for using different things. It becomes very black/white views, and have some crazy out of touch takes, like expecting your grandma to self host lol. They also confuse anonymity with privacy, like how not being able to sign up for something with tor and monero is a privacy violation, it’s not.

      • funnystuff97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it falls into the same pitfalls as most super niche communities, like a lot of subreddits did.

        For example, the shaving subreddit (/r/wicked_edge I think?). Its mission statement was to introduce people to cleaner, safer, and more efficient shaving methods. And for the most part, with all of its resources and wikis, it successfully did it. But if you choose to stay after you’ve made your informed purchases, the posts were mostly braggarts showing off their latest hundreds-of-dollars handles, supreme razor blades, brushes made from actual gold, that sort of thing. My point is, the average person (by my guess, like 90% of people going to the site) gets the information they need and then never participate in the community again. But those who stay are those who really want to stay– people who are most likely to brag and boast. So over time, it falls more and more into plain old dick measuring contests.

        This obviously isn’t true of all communities, but I think it’s a common pitfall for a lot of them. I can imagine privacy is very similar: take all the steps you can to learn to protect your privacy, and then… you’re good, for the most part.

        • online@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow this is great I am surprised to see people talking about this (let alone even being aware of it).

          Really refreshing to not have it to be a contest to follow random dogmas.

          Lemmy is refreshingly smarter than I was used to seeing on Reddit.

          • Welt@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just a slightly higher barrier to entry really filters out the low-quality ignorant/belligerent/unconstructive posters, don’t you think? The relative absence of useless posts made either by bots or unhelpful users is refreshing too. It’s not perfect but it’s a huge step in the right direction.

        • evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reminds me of what happened to the pipe tobacco sub after Reddit banned trading of tobacco.

          What had been a thriving sub of trading, sharing, well written reviews and friendly discussion quickly became stagnant and started leaning towards people showing off their expensive pipes and tobacco orders. Without the people who came for the trading and stayed to chat, the sub became boring quickly.

      • MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pfft. My gramgram self-hosts on her own LFS build with a hardened kernel and custom written SELinux policies. All your grandparents need to get on her level.

        Disclaimer: Everything here is a lie.

      • Ferk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        like how not being able to sign up for something with tor and monero is a privacy violation, it’s not.

        Note that “secrecy” and “privacy” are often understood in Security lingo as different things. One protects confidentiality, the other one protects anonymity.

        It’s possible to have one and not the other…

        You can have a very private system through onion routing but have the contents of the messages exchanged be in plaintext, open to the public. Nobody will be able to know the one who wrote the message was you. But they can see the message. (then there is privacy, but not secrecy).

        Or you can have very strongly encrypted communications (say HTTPS) but have the DNS exchanges (or the TLS handshake, or the IP addresses) be in the clear, so people in the middle (eg. your ISP… or your workplace tech guys) can know exactly that the packages are sent by you and where you sent them, even if their content is encrypted. They can know which service you tried to access to, for how long and how many times (so you have secrecy, but not privacy).

      • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        it quickly becomes a dick measuring contest and shunning people for using different things. It becomes very black/white views, and have some crazy out of touch takes

        In other words, it’s just like literally every online community in the history of the Internet. When Sir TimBL created the first web page, people probably used it to bitch about how everyone else was doing it wrong.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol this is 100% the truth. Privacy communities are a fucking meme. 99% of posts are just people circlejerking about Firefox vs Brave.

      • clanginator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve never gotten why Brave got popular in the first place. I downloaded it once and uninstalled within 3 minutes.

        Cromite and Waterfox are all I’ll ever need.

        • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk and I don’t care. Just tired of watching the Brave circlejerk. Like everyone knows that company is sketchy as absolute shit. If you still want to use the browser then that’s on you. But I’m tired of seeing people screaming about it in every one of these threads lol

  • gasull@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most cryptocurrency communities use Discord or Telegram. It’s such an embarrasment.

    • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never understood this either, given the whole notion and enthusiasm behind decentralization. I get the trade-offs regarding privacy, security, and convenience, but if you’re really tryna start a movement, and you really believe in the concept and principles of something like cryptocurrency, it seems like your communities and communication channels should also reflect similar values.

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Crypto enthusiasts don’t really care or understand decentralization. If you talk to crypto bros you will realize pretty quickly that a lot of them are very very low IQ morons.

        I was at an event and met a crypto bro. He tried to explain to a group of us that btc is like moss and the world is the forest. A couple people legitimately “got it” and began to get excited about crypto.

        • corvus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Crypto enthusiasts don’t really care or understand decentralization.

          I wouldn’t criticize others for their low IQ while making such a dumb generalization.

      • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that’s where you realize that them defending decentralization is just trying to have a nice-sounding argument instead of assuming their dreams of getting rich with new tech

      • HardenedSteel@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you don’t trade off your security, instead you increase it.

        for Bitcoin you can increase your privacy with various tools like coinjoin and lightning network with convenience tradeoff

        or you just use Monero.

        If you have questions feel free to ask in [email protected]

    • HardenedSteel@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should check privacy coin Monero.

      Matrix and XMPP is pretty much popular in XMR community

      And often discord and telegram channels are bridged with other platforms.

    • rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh I hate communities that use Telegram. I mean, sure, I guess there’s better privacy, but Telegram was just not built for that. Messages always get lost, and there are no channels, which means no info channel, so they have to try and cram everything into the description.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should be telling the only two services they use is one infamous for fuck tons of child grooming and one infamous for fuck tons of terrorism.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why it’s so popular… It’s a fancy IRC that’s centralized by a single company

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it has significantly more features than IRC and it’s dead simple to spin up your own “server” where you aren’t beholden much to “admins” or whatever.

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        fancy IRC

        IRC was already “caveman playing with sticks and pebbles” a decade before discord became a thing. It’s really not a good point of comparison and questioning.

        Discord became popular for one simple reason: anyone could make a server, share it with a crossplatform link, and others could then try out that link without installing anything. In other words, it became popular because it literally copied Slack and because the Skype era was atrociously bad customization and ease of use-wise compared to the preceding.

      • folkrav@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every time I see Slack/Discord et Al. described as such, I wonder if any of these people actually used any of those. By use, I mean actually try out its features, not just treating it as IRC (“just” channels, messages and DMs for text convos).

        I hate Discord with a passion, but pretending like it’s just “fancy IRC” is IMHO pretty absurd.

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you legitimately don’t understand why it’s popular, you are seriously out of touch.

      • rbits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Better moderation tools
        • Easier to do voice/video channels
        • Easy to create your own server
        • Huge amount of useful bots created by the community
        • Features like replies, threads, onboarding screens, and custom emotes

        Don’t get me wrong, I wish that we could use a FOSS platform instead of Discord, but 1: people are already using Discord and it’s hard to get everyone to switch platform, and 2: there is no comparable alternative right now

        • blkpws@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think most of those points you said aren’t the reason, there are many ways to manage stuff on platforms more private that has also all of those points you said (Matrix has all of them), and I think the only reason they use discord is that they can show “gaming now”, put a GIF as a user picture and things like this. If for you Discord is easy to use it’s because you have been using it already, for me, it’s confusing.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use it because some of my favorite games for the Nintendo DS that has Wiimmfi support use it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        Too hard to regrow the, already tiny user base in those cases.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, seems like it is only for MK for Wii, as it shows in the always decent active users count, but it supports many games, and I use it mainly for Metroid Prime Hunters and Jump Ultimate Stars.

  • whale@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Matrix has some gaping holes in privacy that are overshadowed only by the gaping holes in user experience.

    But Discord… Discord privacy is far, far worse. While Matrix knows the who, when, where, and some of the what about every one of your conversations, at least it gives you the option to encrypt the contents within them.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s encrypted between you and discord. So somebody on your Wi-Fi can’t see what you’re typing. But it’s not encrypted end to end. Discord can see everything that people talk about. And that’s the problem

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Secure socket layer is a type of encryption. So discord can correctly claim it is encrypted. And the commenter above can get confused by that. Confusing user to server encryption and end-to-end encryption where the messages are encrypted between users is important distinction.

              • library_napper@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ceaser cipher is a type of encrypton. That doesn’t make it safe. Nor is TLS with a terribly broken PKI.

      • whale@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I say encrypted, I mean it as shorthand for “end to end encrypted” aka visible only to the participants in a conversation and not the server itself.

        On Discord, the website owners can search through all their “servers” with the ease at which you search through different rooms within a single Discord server. On Matrix, rooms allow you to encrypt the data so that only you and the other participants can see the contents of it. (At that point, search also breaks down at a fundamental level for you, but that’s out of the scope of this comment…)

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used the Discord bridge before; it works pretty well, and allows Matrix users to practice better (identity & tracking) privacy if they want. There is none, in Discord.

    It does require (a) the Discord community admin to allow the bridge, and (b) some playing with configuration of the bridge to get banning working.

    The biggest issue with Matrix is how privacy-respecting it is. Any public forum with anonymous account creation is subject to spam bots, and requires more work by admins. The biggest complaint about the bridge, and why so many Discord admins do not allow it, is because it greatly increases the spam they have to deal with. Kicking and blocking do work fine through the bridge, but it’s still a distraction requiring constant vigilance.

    Matrix needs better admin tools (where have we heard that before?) Mjolnir is good, but the freely hosted instance was shut down a year or so ago, so it’s not available to casual users. And taking on running a service just for a community bridge is a silly requirement.

    My points are, that it’s not an either-or, but that it requires work. It’s a question of commitment, not possibility. c/privacy could have a Matrix-first, privacy-friendly approach and still offer Discord for privacy casuals; it’s just harder.

  • Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who dislike discord and want a good alternative besides matrix should check out revolt.chat <3

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    A majority stake of Discord is owned by Tencent, which is a Chinese data collection company required by law to pass personal user information to the CCP. Discord runs on an unencrypted network.

    I’m just stating some facts. Make your own judgement call.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tencent is not a data collection company. Discord is not owned by tencent instead tencent and tons of other companies have invested in discord. https://businessmodelanalyst.com/who-owns-discord/

      Tencent itself doesn’t get discords data. Tencent is not required by law to pass all user information to CCP.

      Discord like any communication systems is required to pass data to all major governments when they are investigating crime. Such as the USA and FBI. Your lemmy instance does the same thing.

      Please state facts rather than misinformation. If you are going to pass off these facts provide sources.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty much all companies are data collection companies, or they have data collection services tacked onto their software. However, in this case, Tencent is a company in China, and China is a data collection country.

        Tencent is not required by law to pass all user information to CCP.

        If China wants to see it, then yes they are required by law to pass information to the CCP.

        • MJBrune@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          China is a data collection country.

          Cause the USA isn’t?

          If China wants to see it, then yes they are required by law to pass information to the CCP.

          You should look up the PRISM program.

          If you are going to label Tencent as purely a data collection company belonging to a data collection country then let me remind you that Linux had a social media site that collected a lot of information that could have been turned over to the US federal law enforcement due to prism and the US laws SCA and CLOUD acts.

          So literally if that’s your definition, the Linux Foundation is a data collection company too.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not athletic enough to keep up with your logical leaps.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your only source is to counter a claim I didn’t make. I’m not going to do your homework. If you’re worried about privacy, don’t use Discord. That’s the short version.

        • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Citing sources is the task of the one putting the argument on the table in the first place

          -My kitchen is made out of uranium
          -That’s not true
          -Do you have a source to back this up?
          Doesnt work

        • MJBrune@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          A majority stake of Discord is owned by Tencent

          You said this. My source proves this wrong.

          You are spreading misinformation. I am not going to do your homework to prove your claims.

    • Zastyion345@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This, discord saying no to Microsoft’s offer to buy them out few years back shows they know what they got.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because conversations about increasing privacy doesn’t need to be private. It’s usually about learning about other tools and that they exist.

    • whale@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is true; if it weren’t true, nobody would be on this publicly accessible website making publicly accessible comments

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      This only makes sense if discord is a common entry point into the community which seems unlikely to me

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It probably isn’t, but it’s probably a good place to get a quick answer about something.

        • DefinitelyNotAPenguin@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Again, I just don’t understand what you mean by this, there’s a list of servers, you click one and get a list of channels in that server, click one of those and you’ve got a classic chatroom.

          What is it you find chaotic?

          • berg@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            When I started out with discord I felt like such a boomer. Four years in it’s a breeze, until I made my own server, then it was a few weeks back with the boomer feel.

            If you’re coming from mumble/ventrilo or such, there’s quite a bit to learn imo. Especially if you never used skype or the like, and were used to IRC. Or I’m just a boomer…

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              IRC-dwelling Gen Z here. Discord is an abomination. Not to mention that it’s apparently not very friendly to third-party clients, while the official one as well as browser version is very heavy. Like, “a third of what my whole OS consumes” heavy.

              Left Discord a while ago, no regrets.

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Funny, I feel the same way about Matrix clients, instead. They’re not that bad, but they could use quite a bit of polish (and they also don’t rake in millions a year, so it’s not an exactly fair comparison).
      I guess it just comes down to what you’re used to