• danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    We really need to all stop promoting Fedora especially after what Red Hat did to the Community with CentOS and closing the code off from downstream.

    Fedora is Red Hat in disguise.

    Same goes for Canonical. They’ve decided to screw the Community and try force things on users, Communist style, so they can f right off too!

    We should all only use 100% Community based distros and projects because they need our support and break their backs working for the Community.

    For example Linux Mint, Debian, Arch, Slackware and others.

    If you use Mint like I do, switch to Debian Edition and let the developers know that’s where you prefer that focus first and then do the Ubuntu edition afterwards 👍

    • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fedora is community based and “independent” from RedHat.

      In the past, they often actively decided against RHs interests and will continue doing that in the future.
      Independend in " because RH puts lots of dev power and $ into the Fedora Project, and loosing that would hurt.

      It’s a symbiotic relationship: RH provides money and developers, while we as users test for new technologies that will get used for RHEL in the future.

      The increased ressources provides us with more (also financial) security. Still, if RH somehow decides to abandon Fedora, it will still continue to live on, see Project uBlue as example.


      Also, calling everything you dislike “communist” is just dumb, there are way better words for that… Either, you use communism in the terms of “totalitarian government” like Stalin was, which is just… unfitting (Holodomor, etc.); or you don’t get that promoting community based distros is more socialist than you realize.

      Just say “I don’t like stuff forced on me from corporations like Canonical” and don’t use Ubuntu and thereof. Nobody hinders you in using what you want, and that’s great!

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        But you don’t understand - I have reputable sources telling me that Linux is communism!

      • 601error@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reaction is funny too, because in my experience comparing communities of various distros, Fedora’s community is among the the most inviting and professionally-behaving of them.

        Personally, I am not running Fedora at the moment, but probably will when my Framework 16 arrives, since Fedora is officially supported on it. And to be honest, I find that I am making the same choices with Arch as Fedora would have made for me (aside from bootloader), so I feel that I’m wasting a bit of effort.

    • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      How the hell is a for profit company communist. The idiocy of this world never fails to amaze me

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s not ‘communist’.

        they (rh) can charge all they want, that is allowed. but denying those who do pay the rights granted by gpl (et al.) is not.

    • vhalragnarok@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fedora is like it or not one of the most influential and important Distros out there.

      Fedora is and will always be cutting edge. They early adopt projects and technologies that absolutely become the standard.

      No other distro has this much influence. SystemD, Pipe wire, and other such projects are the norm because Fedora pushed it.

      And like it or not, Fedora will make this move very soon with Wayland. Wayland is our inevitable future, like it or not.

      I don’t see Arch, Debian, and others pushing things like this, but rather falling in line with Fedora.

      • alt@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fedora is and will always be cutting leading edge.

        Fixed that for you ;) .

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why we should stop using them. If they have zero users, they’ll eventually stop the Fedora project and the Community can keep pace with Debian or openSuse. openSuse can easily step into Fedora and Red Hat’s shoes.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Instead of trying to tear down things that work, try building up the distros that don’t.

          • sab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that sounds like work. It’s a lot easier to shit on other people’s volunteer efforts than to actually contribute anything constructive yourself.

          • danielfgom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            You need to understand that Red Hat/Fedora regards the Linux Community as “free loaders”. That’s how they designed described anyone wanting access to Red Hat Server source code.

            That’s what they think of you and me and all the great developers who make a lot of the software we use, often in their free time and at no cost.

            Most of the distros and software you use on Linux is made and maintained by people who are not paid but do it for the love of Libre open source freedom loving computing for all.

            That is the FOSS way. Red Hat/Fedora do not share this view. They see us all as free loaders.

            If all the great Devs who contribute so much to GNU/Linux had that attitude, you’d literally have no free distro or apps.

            That means no poor third world person would ever have access to an operating system or pc. Only us well off people in the developed world. That’s anti FOSS.

            Don’t support ass hats like Red Hat/Fedora who stand against that.

            And now we see Canonical also being ass hats but only by including telemetry in Ubuntu, but forcing snaps on end users, blocking flatpak out of the box (you can still install it yourself but newbies won’t know this) and they are aiming to eventually make Ubuntu snap only. Not to mention they worked with Microsoft to make “Linux subsystem for Windows” which is a real insult to Linux and FOSS.

            Use Debian and other Community based distros which have zero corporate funding or involvement and are 100% by the people for the people

        • Mane25@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they have zero users, they’ll eventually stop the Fedora project

          That would be a very sad loss.

          • danielfgom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. It’s what they deserve for screwing over the community. Let them pay for beta testers instead of getting free beta testing from the community

            • Mane25@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Try not to believe everything you read by random people online, Red Hat pays people to work on Fedora, you have no idea what you’re talking about.

              • danielfgom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I know they pay Fedora work because most of the employees ARE full time Red Hat employees.

                Hence my point that the user is the free beta tester for Enterprise software.

                Stop being a free beta tester for a Mega Corp that hates the Linux Community. Rather use Debian, Arch or another Community developed OS.

                • Mane25@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  First of all you’ve swallowed the myth that Fedora users are beta testing for Enterprise software. That said discouraging people from voluntarily beta testing is bad for the community and fundamentally against the spirit of open source.

                  As a long-time Fedora user I think Red Hat’s backing is good for Fedora because it means they have a solid source of funding. Apart from the resources that gives them, that way they can be entirely user-centric and not be tempted to sell user data, run ads or anything else against the users’ interests.

                  There’s a lot of hearsay going on around Red Hat at the moment, some of it has grains of truth, some of it has been distorted beyond fact, I’m sorry that you’re a victim of it.

                  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Beta testing is great. Just not when it’s for Red Hat(Fedora), Canonical, Microsoft (WSL) or any other Greedy Corp. when they are requesting this in the spirit of open source.

                    Rather beta test for Debian

        • Kaidao@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would this be a good thing at all? One of the main goals of the ecosystem is to have multiple choices, and as others in this thread has mentioned, Fedoras made significant progress for the adoption of Linux as a whole

          • danielfgom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because you’d be helping Community distros get better, as well as financially, instead of supporting corporations that use you as beta testers to improve their paid corporate product and then screw you over when you want access to the server code.

            • Kaidao@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I still don’t see how having the choice is a bad thing. If you don’t like Red Hats position, then don’t use Fedora. For those that believe using Fedora will help better the Open Source ecosystem, they have the ability to do so.

              Getting rid of a choice completely because you don’t agree with a position in a nuanced conversation seems childish

              • danielfgom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not saying it will be banned, you can still use it but I’m calling the community to return to community distros like Debian who are 100% libre and user freedom respecting… Plus there many dedicated developers and other volunteers who support this out of love for FOSS and the principles of free computing for all.

                That’s not childish. It’s a call to get back to our roots. Use Community distros, volunteer your time if you have the skills they need, make a money donation to thank them and help the project keep going. That’s how FOSS is supposed to work.

                By the Community, for the Community 💪

        • vhalragnarok@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          OpenSuse has a very well defined pipeline:

          Tumbleweed -> Leap (maybe Slowroll) -> SLE.

          OpenSuse is not going to break new ground. It’s all about OBS and testing software before it hits their Paid Enterprise offerings. And they have almost a fully automated procedure for this. OpenSuse is not going to push Wayland only nor what will become the standard. It’s not in their ethos. OpenSuse is there to build SLE’s next release.

          Debian being cutting edge?! Never. Debian is Debian, very slow to adopt anything. Debian is about offering a very stable release schedule. Debian will never push the ecosystem forward, it’s not Debian’s goal. You want a reliable system that just works? Debian is inarguably the king.

          • danielfgom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agree 100%. And both are 100% Community. openSuse is privately owned and supported by a massive Community.

            Debian is perfect for reliability (although opensuse is very reliable) who don’t need the latest and don’t like installing updates all the time. 100% Community based.

            Two fantastic, shining examples of the power of Community supported software 💪