• eleitl@lemmy.mlOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nuclear electricity is not a solution to loss of cheap, abundant fossil hydrocarbons. You are correct that this results in coal as the only option left.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Studies show that ash from coal power plants contains significant quantities of arsenic, lead, thallium, mercury, uranium and thorium. To generate the same amount of electricity, a coal power plant gives off at least ten times more radiation than a nuclear power plant.

      Oh well!

      • eleitl@lemmy.mlOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Far more relevant is that coal can’t be used for agile power production, and domestic reserves are rapidly running out. And it can’t substitute for lack of cheap oil and gas for the same reason nuclear and renewable power can’t.

        I’m leaving out greenhouse gas emissions because their actions show that nobody cares. At most it’s PR for the gullible.