• Roderik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not all AI is bad. In the healthcare sector it could improve decision-making, produce personalised treatment plans, and so forth.

    Obviously, the healthcare professionals will have final say, but it’s a good tool to have. AI will not replace them. Though it will streamline cumbersome processes.

    I am all for AI as long as it’s used in a non-dystopian manner.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are already talks of military use, reading all your texts, eliminating jobs with no plan to support those who lost them, AI driven cars killing people, taking all creative work from humans and leaving the menial tasks…that’s nowhere near a complete list and it’s already dystopian.

      The thing is, when private companies are the ones that hold the tech and monetize it, shit is going to get dystopian before you can say “artichoke.” Capitalism is dystopian. Late stage capitalism even more so. And we are fast approaching a new frontier in which these same evil tech companies will wield this unbelievable power. I get it. There are good uses. But when the end goal is profit, our best interest comes second, if not last.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a tool like anything else. It’ll be used for everything like anything else. It cannot be stopped. All we can hope for are tools to mitigate the damage and applications to outweigh what bad it’s capable of. Trying to slow it down is like trying to stop a flood with buckets. Build a boat, it will only keep rising.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      produce personalised treatment plans

      Isn’t that what the doctor is already supposed to be doing? Looking at our history, charts, treatment attempts and customizing? Because if not I could just WebMD and pay a doc to write a scrip.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are a lot of things doctors record in evaluations, and they feed these AIs this information and instead of these AIs spitting out a “diagnosis” they calculate risk of harm vs risk of further investigation.

        In things like pediatrics, this reduces the need for unpleasant and dangerous procedures - a CT scan impacts a 6 year old way more than a 30 year old.

        AI is extremely useful for problem domains with a ton of input, medicine being one. Doctors can only do so much and rely on algorithms just like the AI does. The AI has the benefit of being able to do it a fuckload faster, more accurately, and compare it to more relevant things.

        Don’t confuse it with generative AI. this is a very different system than that.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      AI is going to be used to deny care and entrench racism in medicine.

      It’s insane to think anything else might happen.