I did sports semi professionally at some point. The people in my club who did so professionally were already fucked bad enough, with the anti doping agents having to know where they were at all times.
Imagine on top having very sensitive information from your medical records public. Imagine you are dropped out of the most prestigous top athlete bracket, because your body fat ratio increased half a percent too much after you had an injury.
Also imagine at say the swimming world cup there isnt just 2 dozen different competitions already seperated into men and women, but with another 4 subsections. These things also mean that the attention to the sports have to be spread among more people and outside of the popular sports that will drop many people out of attention and money spent on the sport.
Imagine on top having very sensitive information from your medical records public. Imagine you are dropped out of the most prestigous top athlete bracket, because your body fat ratio increased half a percent too much after you had an injury.
Isn’t that already a thing for sports with weight classes? Having fairer matches makes things more interesting in all divisions.
You don’t even need more divisions. Just more precise ways of making them.
It gives no more information than body fat percent. Unless you’re already making an assumption about body fat %, muscle %, height, etc, you can’t guess someone’s weight from the outside.
For the top end of cycling (and probably other endurance sports), things like V02max for top athletes seems be pretty common knowledge already. But I’m not sure how objectively that can be measured if someone is intent on suppressing it to stay in a certain bracket. So height would still probably be more useful, at least for flats.
Imo, either make divisions based directly on factors that matter, which varies from sport to sport but most often comes down to things like height and weight, or get rid of them.
I did sports semi professionally at some point. The people in my club who did so professionally were already fucked bad enough, with the anti doping agents having to know where they were at all times.
Imagine on top having very sensitive information from your medical records public. Imagine you are dropped out of the most prestigous top athlete bracket, because your body fat ratio increased half a percent too much after you had an injury.
Also imagine at say the swimming world cup there isnt just 2 dozen different competitions already seperated into men and women, but with another 4 subsections. These things also mean that the attention to the sports have to be spread among more people and outside of the popular sports that will drop many people out of attention and money spent on the sport.
Isn’t that already a thing for sports with weight classes? Having fairer matches makes things more interesting in all divisions.
You don’t even need more divisions. Just more precise ways of making them.
weigth classes are much more broader. Your weight does not tell more about how your body is constituted than can be seen from the outside already.
It gives no more information than body fat percent. Unless you’re already making an assumption about body fat %, muscle %, height, etc, you can’t guess someone’s weight from the outside.
For the top end of cycling (and probably other endurance sports), things like V02max for top athletes seems be pretty common knowledge already. But I’m not sure how objectively that can be measured if someone is intent on suppressing it to stay in a certain bracket. So height would still probably be more useful, at least for flats.
Imo, either make divisions based directly on factors that matter, which varies from sport to sport but most often comes down to things like height and weight, or get rid of them.