• scratchandgame@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Tiếng Việt
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Cool. Then many more people would switch from Linux to BSDs instead. Which is better.

          • geoma@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Its more of a niche. You probably won’t have the huge support you have on gnu/Linux nowadays

            • scratchandgame@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              Tiếng Việt
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              “gnu/Linux nowadays” is unusable on old hardware (except distros like Alpine) I think?

          • flying_gel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It’s not necessarily better, some things are a personal preference. Though some might be able to list some technical pros and cons.

            Some things I appreciate are:

            • base systems and packages are completely separate. Packages and their configuration goes in /usr/local/ No where else. (Thought they might write to /var/ )
            • bsd init, not systemd. Feels more home to me as a late 90s slackware user.
            • first class zfs support. Linux has caught up lately, especially now that there is a shared zfs codebase for both Linux and FreeBSD. When I switched to FreeBSD on my home server ~10 years ago that wasn’t the case.
      • scratchandgame@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Tiếng Việt
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That research is much easier than figuring out what is computer’s “stack” without using my first language!