• spacedogroy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    All sounds pretty sensible. I do think it might feel annoying waiting minutes to download a model for the sake of generating a line of alt text the first time, though. It would probably be quicker to write the alt text.

    • elfpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think it’s about generating alt text for people with disabilities when they are missing from pictures.

      • uhN0id@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah if someone that is blind comes across a page I’m sure waiting for the description to generate is more valuable/worthwhile than a faster experience with no information at all.

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It’s a neat option but the example proof of concept alt text “The Firefox logo”, as I understand it, it isn’t ideal for describing the image.

    Maybe something like this?

    The Firefox logo which consists of a Fox wrapped around a sphere

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That would depend on the context. How the logo looks like does not matter most of the time, only when the logo itself is the topic.

      • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Makes sense. And if it’s not relative to the content you just put decorative only right?

        So…

        Welcome to Firefox ([Logo for Firefox] marked as decorative)

        vs

        Our sponsors are [Logo for Microsoft] [Logo for Firefox] [Logo for Google]