• TRSea@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    UNfortunately?! … But seriously, thanks for the fact check, I was wondering.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      UNfortunately?!

      Aside from the US military (or military scavenging in general), if I could sacrifice myself to power a robot (better than lawn clippings could) I might. I don’t think it’d be unlikely that there’s a scenario where said robots would be doing something right (some point/goal) if they’re autonomous (in the governmental sense).

      I mean I’d rather have my brain hooked up to something, but I guess that doesn’t help with wattage requirement.

      • TRSea@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haha, that is hilarious. But I think there is enough other biomass on this planet that you shouldnt feel like you have to sacrifice yourself to feed even the good robots

        • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure, never said it was a healthy thought. But it’s like an equivalent exchange type thing, less like putting a log on a fire and more like a few tanks of energy-dense fuel (not that it actually could work like that).