Canonical needs it to monetize Ubuntu.
The users? They don’t
Canonical needs it to monetize Ubuntu.
The users? They don’t
Ubuntu > Sabayon > mint > Arch > Mandriva > CentOS > Debian testing & Arch ( just the best ones )
I would not call Android a Linux. It may have the kernel but it isn’t much GNU in it
Yes and no. I did build several in-house enterprise applications and for this I know about this problem. And yes you’re right, a lot of the complicated contexts are more complex than searching on Google.
But! Enterprise software architects have a tendency to make every feature as visible, and also making the apps as feature rich as possible. This comes with high costs.
I always try to establish a strive with exactly what google delivers.
Cage the user in his first decision, Filter or action and then show him or her the application with all the features feasible in the chosen context. It is amazing how complexity reduced most of these applications are when you just ask this first question.
It is. I like Linux exactly because I trust the packages from the distribution. Everything else is an attack vector and untrusted
Edit: you install random binaries from the internet? Oo
Op neither likes people decided to not kill animals nor people using community driven distributions.
You could have used the original meme. The mindset matches
What could be wrong with random foreign executables in your system?
Should be straight forward. If you willing to do all the work, the Debian community should be very welcoming
Eventually, yes. It may be faster available if you contribute on maintaining the packages, though.
You can debootstrap your debian yourself. It’s not the same as arch but even more configurable
On my side it’s running since years without problems. I would never use arch on a business workstation with debian testing I see no problems at all.
Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.
If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)
Somewhat but it is a rolling release. Packages will be major-updated constantly.
There where Times when Ubuntu was Marks baby, but nowadays with pro, advertisement and tracking in the terminal an AppStore, everything has to have a businesscase.
I would recommend just plain Debian either with flatpak or in the testing branch. It’s almost the same, stable as a rock and driven by a community.
Arch should have the same zsh profile you have on the live image, installed after the installation by default.
Maybe you should switch your favourite then?
The enshittification of Ubuntu will not stop on an enforced Appstore.
Just use Debian testing. There it will arrive in Spring.
Old Ubuntu? No sir!
Installed it yesterday and it’s amazing. Faster than RC1 and most of the bugs are gone.
Imagine a webser or proxy and for every incoming request it creates an new thread 💣
Yes you’re right if it’s a second or third thread it is/may be fine. But if you’re i/o bound and your application has to manage quite a lot of that stuff in parallel, there is no way around delegating that workload to the kernel’s event loop. Async/Await is just a very convenient abstraction of that Ressource.
deleted by creator