• Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Notice how the folks arguing in favor of Communism have sources and receipts, while the folks arguing against it have done nothing but regurgitated Capitalist propaganda. Also note folks who are opposed to Communism and Marx’s philosophy are always forced to admit that it only works on paper, because his logic is irrefutable if you address it with a modicum of intellectual honesty…

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bruh, almost every old person I’ve heard talk about Communism that lived under it talks about it fondly. Lmao

        • Mercival@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have a whole fucking family, who lived through the USSR. Not a single one of them misses it. Being spied on every step you take, my grandma has the “you never know who’s watching” mentality to this day.

          That’s not to say they don’t hate the current regime, but it’s nothing compared to the absolute atrocities of the USSR’s secret police.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bruh there is a reason Putin is framing his imperialist ideations as a revival of the USSR. Also I’ve watched a shit ton of bald and bankrupt videos where all the old people he talks to go on and on about how times were better under the Soviet governments. Facts dont care about your feelings

            • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              You know, it’s a universal thing. That’s what MAGA is about, that’s what Hitler pushed. Glorifying distant past no one really remembers, reinventing it, it’s fucked up, especially if it’s promoted via selective parts of it. You can’t use political stunts as a proof of anything. They sell you dreams because they can’t show something real, they can’t show important systemic improvements. In times of fuck ups, they show you that billboard, shining so bright it’s blinding, while bread prices climb 2-3x to what they were a decade ago. And people indulge in that constructed feeling of it being better before, while government can do whatever they want.

              • Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you had free healthcare, education, housing, and a stable job in the USSR, watching it all evaporate is bound to draw up some nostalgia

              • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, how about people currently living through communism? 83% of Chinese people believe they live in a democracy, more than in the US. Chinese citizens are on average around 4 times wealthier than their parents. Millennials are the first generation in US history to be poorer than their parents. Most of the wealth in the US is held by boomers who lived through the tail end of new deal social democracy.

                Do you also disregard these accounts by people who are currently living through communism? Or will you move the goal post again?

              • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Things got much worse for most citizens of the USSR after it collapsed and state industry was privatized. Life expectancy dropped pretty severely. It shouldn’t be surpassing that anyone who suffered under that economic collapse would tell you the USSR was better.

          • GrapesOfAss@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dude this is pure what aboutism

            You’re claiming communism is so great and when presented with links you just go “WELL WHAT ABOUT ALL THIS HUH” and then completely ignore the above. It’s ridiculous. Actual text book definition of what about ism. Seriously stop and think for yourself for two seconds without restarting to this tribal shit slinging mentality.

            Yeah, capitalism is bad, we live in it, we can see that happening around us, but you’re eating literal propaganda about communism and ignoring actual verifiable evidence. This isn’t a capitalism vs communism debate, there are more than two fucking systems you smooth brain chud

            • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              So what’s your solution? And what verifiable evidence are you talking about?

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The holodomor narrative surrounding the ussr wide famine of 32-33 was literal nazi propaganda from open nazi collaborators and was used as a justification for the mass murder of jews in Eastern Europe during the holocaust.

          It was debunked in the literal 1930s in the US and now it re-emerges like a zombie during an era where fascism is on the rise. Even anticommunist academics like Applebaum, Davies, and Conquest say it wasn’t a genocide.

          • probablyaCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            What a crock of shit. Practically every historian says it was caused by soviet policy. The only debate that occurs if whether it was due to stupidity or intentional genocide.

            1

            2

            3

            4

            I could keep going. Gonna tell me how the Holocaust was a lie too?

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Literally none of your sources definitively claim it was a genocide except the university of Minnesota one which cites Davies and Applebaum who later says it wasn’t.

              Also lol, you use Wikipedia, a random university of Minnesota webpage, KellogInsight, and I dont even know where you got your last source but it literally cites Wheatcroft and Davies amongst others who do not argue it was a genocide after examining the soviet archives.

              Gonna tell me how the Holocaust was a lie too?

              No, the holocaust is a well documented historical fact, unlike the holodomor. The soviet wide famine of 1932 and 33 is a well documented historical fact, it is also not considered a genocide by mainstream anticommunist historians, who argue to what extent soviet policies and which policies worsened the famine.

              Also ironic that you ask “do you also deny the holocaust” given the holodomor myth was used as justification to kill Jewish people during the holocaust and was later used as justification for collaboration with the holocaust.

              Here is a well respected Jewish historian and activist on it:

              https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

              • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wow the lengths commies go to deny actual genocide.

                We all know communism is an ideology strictly for the uneducated and violent, why try so hard to make it seem like something else? The countless sexual and ethnic minorities murdered by communism due to its inherent hateful nature is something only the nazis on the other end of the fascism-spectrum rivaled.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The lengths liberals will to go to buy into fascist atrocity propaganda that was used as justification for the mass slaughter of Jewish people by nazis and nazi collaborators

                  The countless sexual and ethnic minorities murdered by communism due to its inherent hateful nature is something only the nazis on the other end of the fascism-spectrum rivaled.

                  You’re literally doing fascist propaganda. Here is a liberal Jewish holocaust historian and activist writing on it:

                  https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

                  • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Fascists kill minorities, wow, who would’ve thought. It’s amazing how many commies pretend to label themselves as anti racist and pro trans rights, yet just so happen to advocate for an ideology based on murdering people on the basis of their ethnicity and sexual/gender orientation. Coincidence don’t you think?

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The joke is that Capitalism DOES NOT have a solution to homelessness because there is zero profit motive to solve it. And facts dont care about your feelngs, you cant refute Marx’s philosophy while being intellectual honest. Capitalist Economists study Das Kapital because Marx was so fucking spot on.

          • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The existence of state run social services and regulations does not mean a country is not fully capitalist if you’re using Marx’s understanding of what capitalism is. Additionally I think there is a misconception that communism depends on altruistic behavior. It really doesn’t.

        • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          No need to refute Marx, reality has already proven time and time again that communism doesn’t work in practice.

          Btw your argument only applies to “pure” capitalism, without any government interference. Homelessness is not really an issue in many European countries.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean the reality where every 1st world nation on the planet did everything in their power to keep Communism from working. Bahahaha

            • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Didn’t take much to stop a system dreamed up by idealists and idiots from working. The very concept is flawed.

              • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Tell me you haven’t read Marx without telling me you haven’t read Marx.

                Seriously though, Marx is like the guy you go read if you want a ruthless critique of idealism. I’d go so far as to say it’s the reason his theories became so popular in the first place.

                • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Who cared about Marx? He wrote a book. He didn’t lead a country. Nobody cares about theories when they don’t hold up in practice. And they never have.

                  • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re right, nobody has ever cared about Marx. No communist revolutionaries anywhere have ever called themselves Marxists. If they did, then their projects must have surely collapsed by now. That’s because Marx was very clear that his political theories were not made to be adaptable or revisable based on new information and changing conditions. No, that would be far too scientific for someone we can agree was clearly an idealist.