It’s true that people’s give too (Edit because I think people’s don’t understand,i should say faith because it’s true that say credit is a wrong way of saying it sorry about that) much faith to science. Indeed science, especially when it come to consensus is to be believe, a scientific experiments can be replicate and if multiple result give the same result and/or give us the same conclusion, then that mean FOR NOW it’s a consensus. But never forget that we might one day have evidence that the experiment where wrong, that the conclusion what impregnates with ideology or that some important point where excluded.
After all scientists are also humans, even with the best analytics etc, our reflection, our ideology or our cognitive biases can make wrong conclusion or make people’s unconsciously excludes some contradictions.
In the end I think we should always be open to new theory, try to look and see people’s that don’t have the same ideology, political beliefs, opinions etc. It’s by trying to see the mountain in its globally that we shall be closer to the true.
In the ends those who use their “recent independent study” For evidence that what they think is the true are those who are the more blind. An independent or multiple independent study are not a consensus. They are indicator of what might be possible or true. Only a true consensus with years of research and experiment can give us a somewhat objective and definitive answer.
This “post” is the 2023 equivalent of standing on a corner with a megaphone and a sign with some unreadable bird scratch minus the word “Jesus” or “repent”.
I’m not trying to gaslight, you actually need mental help. This is a place to post memes and you went on an unstable rant.
Can you explain me more your opinion please? You pick my attention.
He’s saying this community is for memes (a type of funny image or joke, usually a cultural reference). So this is the wrong community for the discussion (and I honestly don’t know where it would fit). Edit: I noticed there is a meme, but usually the caption is just for a very short description for the visually impaired having it read to them.
Also, they’re taking your message as saying that science shouldn’t be trusted (a common anti-vaccine and anti-education argument made by many Christians) - that’s what they’re referring to about the “man with the megaphone and sign.” I don’t know if that’s what you were intending to say or not, but that’s how it came across. Your point makes sense, but they’re assuming your conclusion is that science in general is bad - mostly because of the recent political issues regarding that. Hope that helps.
It smells like anti-vaxxer in this post
I don’t think anti-vaxxe is a good thing since we’ve learn a lots about biology. In fact I love that! It’s fascinating. I mean it’s incredible even to imagine who evolution have made our immune system so much amazing!
I think a huge problem is that the average person doesn’t have the capacity to read and understand the actual published research paper. If you don’t work in that particular field its like reading another language. They also dont know how to interpret the data, or look at sample sizes and associated statistics. Whether or not its peer reviewed or if the experiments have been repeated is a whole other aspect most people wont consider. Couple that with the fact that most articles written about scientific breakthroughs are written by the same people with a lack of understanding and you end up with this weird whisper down the alley lost in translation effect.
It’s difficult to do more than that too. I see these headlines and articles, I know about this problem, and I can understand many research papers. However, the time and effort it takes to parse those things out is usually too much for me. There’s just too much and not enough time, so at some point I have to trust it. Otherwise I need a really good reason to look into it further and invest that extra energy, which really would prefer be spent on my personal life instead
deleted by creator
The first words:
It’s true that…
Literally your shitty uninformed opinion that appeared to you while you were drunk. I don’t need to read this, it’s always the same conspiratard BS about covid, jews, nazis or stuff like that.
deleted by creator
And /r/iamverysmart too!
You convinced me, I read your text. It sucks and it’s the same bullshit used to sell magic oil to people who have cancer. I hope you’re proud.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s true that people’s give too much credit to science
You should be ashamed enough to go back to literal first grade and start the learning process over because you failed completely.
deleted by creator
You made it worse. Science is not religion no matter how hard you need it to be.
deleted by creator
You already published your opinion in c/memes. there’s not much work left for us after that
Why? Random meme is a formate I made because I found something funny and share it. And if I think I have something to say then it’s okey to say it. I don’t really care that you or people’s dislike my opinion. In fact I am happy with that! I really want to ears different opinion. The only thing I hate is when Twitter ideology (cancel culture and plain insult) are involve
Edit : And of you really dislike me or me saying thing then go a laughter out of me. I don’t want to share bad vibe, if really people’s starte to say that my involvement in any way is problematic or that the way I question thing is bad then you can say it to me. You could change my opinion and made me stop!
