I’m wondering if a distro like the one I’m looking for even exists:

  • simple as in KISS and vanilla. This excludes Debian where the package manager is too complex and packages deviate from upstream too much, as well as OpenSUSE, where systems administration relies on GUI tools too much and the package manager is even more complex.
  • fixed release (excludes everything Arch-based)

So from the major distros, only Fedora is left as an option, where I really don’t know enough about it. Is it possible to do a minimal install of it? Is it built around a GUI app store? Does it rely on Flatpak like Ubuntu does with Snap?

Or are there other distros out there that I’m not aware of? Basically everything from the past 5 years I have no experience with. I’ve heard good things about NixOS, but it sounds weird as a daily driver.

  • MadMaurice@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you say Debian’s and OpenSUSE’s package manager are too complex for you, I can tell you that NixOS’ package manager is definitely not for you.

  • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What on God’s green flat earth are these requirements??

    What about apt do you find too complex? I guess what are you defining as 'complex"?

    I’m terms of package management you’ll be hard pressed to find anything that requires less work that apt, yum, zypper or their various GUIs.

    Debian is the most vanilla distro you can get and you are excluding it out of the gate because of apt. So it would be helpful for all of us to understand your complexity issues with apt (and zypper).

    It was my first distro and I miss it a lot. Simplicity and stability are main selling points

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about apt do you find too complex? I guess what’s re you defining as 'complex"?

      The fact that it has recommended and suggested dependencies, meta-packages and virtual packages, that installing a package ad then removing it again often leaves your system in a different state than before, that it has 7 different default front-ends for different tasks, …

      Debian is the most vanilla distro you can get

      Debian packages often deviate significantly from upstream.

    • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Talking for myself and not OP: What’s complex about apt and yum is the package format per se. The cli is very straightforward and “just works”, but whenever you want something that’s not packaged and need to package it yourself, you gotta fasten your seatbelt and prepare for the complex task of creating an RPM or a DEB package.

      I know there are tools to help with that, but I’ve created packages for many distros (Debian, CentOS, Alpine, Arch, Void and Crux), and rpm/deb are just way more complex to create than the alternatives.

        • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How often does that happen–where you need to package your own deb or it leaving orphan meta-packages that it doesn’t remove? Or is this more of a ‘curiosity’ than hard requirement because I think ultimately the short answer to your question is: I dont think it exists as you’ve described it.

          Fedora Silverblue seems like it might get close. It’s immutable OS with flatpaks that sit on top. At least that’s my understanding of it since I haven’t used it myself. I have NixOS in a VM so I could learn it and NixOS is similar in that its immutable, but its definitely complex. Its also hard to use–which is a distinction you are making in this thread as well. So I am not sure its ‘better’ than any of those others in the grand scheme of things. In my limited experience with it as a pretty advanced linux user, it would probably be a solid daily driver after you spent 2 years tuning your config to your liking. But simple things will have your tripping over yourself.

          It has the learning curve of vim and the expression language is a bit annoying since its a special unique thing you have to learn. Its not exactly hard but its not intuitive either and the documentation isn’t super approachable even if everyone says its great.

          One of those immutable OS’s with flatpak on top would probably be the closet I think you can get to what you are asking.

          • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            % pm -i | wc -l
            55
            

            That’s how many software I packaged myself. They are installed to /usr/local using an alternative package manager because I couldn’t be bothered with making an appropriate .deb.

            And as to explain how this alternate workflow is less complex, here’s how I go about installing a program:

            % git clone git://git.z3bra.org/human ~/code/human
            Cloning into '/home/z3bra/code/human'...
            remote: Enumerating objects: 53, done.
            remote: Counting objects: 100% (53/53), done.
            remote: Compressing objects: 100% (53/53), done.
            remote: Total 53 (delta 28), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
            Receiving objects: 100% (53/53), 9.35 KiB | 195.00 KiB/s, done.
            Resolving deltas: 100% (28/28), done.
            % cd $_
            % pack
            CC human.c
            LD human
            install -D -m 0755 human /tmp/tmp.rfnbLyIQOz/usr/local/bin/human
            install -D -m 0644 human.1 /tmp/tmp.rfnbLyIQOz/usr/local/man/man1/human.1
            
                    > /tmp/[email protected]
            
            installed human (0.3)
            % pm -i human
            usr/
            usr/local/
            usr/local/bin/
            usr/local/bin/human
            usr/local/man/
            usr/local/man/man1/
            usr/local/man/man1/human.1
            
  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ve picked pretty stupid criteria, but if you’re adamant on it, as another commenter said Slackware is probably one of the best options.

    Fedora dances with Flatpak quite a bit, but you could double check if RHEL does (since that’s what Fedora is based on).

    Again, while Slackware (and possibly RHEL) fit your criteria, your criteria seems pretty silly, and you’re likely to walk into bigger (and harder to solve) problems on more obscure platforms.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This excludes Debian where the package manager is too complex and packages deviate from upstream too much

    This isn’t even remotely true.

    Also going with Debian + GNOME Software + Flatpak isn’t a bad ideia at all. Unlike Snaps, Flatpaks are fast you won’t notice delays and waste 10GB of RAM for each application you want to use. And at the end of the day you get rock solid Debian + the latest and greatest software as Flatpaks without “deviation from upstream” and you also keep a clean system.

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like you’re confusing “hard to use” with “complex”.
      Apt is extremely complex under the hood, which shows when you try to build a package for it, or install a package with many dependencies then remove it again, leaving traces behind, or when you break your system by using different front-ends (apt, apt-get, aptitude, synaptic) which are all included in the default installation, but handle dependencies differently.

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most modern package managers have that level of complexity tho… That dependency tracking can take a lot of computation.

        Maybe a notable exception would be Slackware package manager, but you won’t find what you’d expect from modern package manager (e.g. dependency resolving, autoremove package).

        I find building packages with Gentoo to be much simpler than with Debian. Probably this is due to the fact that Gentoo users would regularly build their packages, unlike Debian.

        I also learned Debian automatically generate dependency list by scanning the binaries of each package to see what dynamic libs it links. Bet that does add to the complexity by much.

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You complained about reliance on GUI tools, so you’re going to have to explain how that isn’t easy to use if folk are to help you. What is the issue with that for you?

        Most stuff on opensuse, you can also do on command line. Having a GUI to help people who like a GUI doesn’t mean people who like command line aren’t facilitated.

    • monobot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have the same recommendation, try slack out it really feets.

      But I think it will be like Genie fullfiling your wishes - you don’t really know what you are looking for, but it might really suit you.

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has recommended and suggested dependencies, meta-packages and virtual packages, installing a package and then removing it again often leaves your system in a different state than before, it has 7 different default front-ends that can break your system if you switch which one you use, …

      Pacman and Slackpkg are examples of simple package managers.

  • monobot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Slackware is obvious choice, exactly what you are looking for.

    It was my first distro and I miss it a lot. Simplicity and stability are main selling points.

  • hodor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t used it myself, and admittedly am entirely unfamiliar, but a buddy put popos on something recently and was talking about how smooth and simple it was. Might be worth a gander.

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taking apt as an example: The fact that it has recommended and suggested dependencies, meta-packages and virtual packages, that installing a package and then removing it again often leaves your system in a different state than before, that it has 7 different default front-ends for different tasks, (don’t mix them!), apt-pinning, blacklists, 5 different repository branches, …

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Hard to use” isn’t an issue for me. I simply dislike rolling release distros.

        • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, NixOS has both stable and rolling release channels so you can choose which you want to use, and you can even use unstable packages while on the stable channel. And you can just not update for a couple months and it’ll be fine.