alt text

Tweet by San Antonio Express-New, saying: “Sen. Rafael Edward Cruz, who uses the preferred name Ted, has introduced a bill to limit the use of preferred names and pronouns.”

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        the express-news, along with the newspapers in austin, corpus christi, dallas, el paso, fort worth, houston, and longview, all endorsed beto in 2018.

          • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is another reason everyone in charge is scared of remote work. The divide is what keeps this ridiculous political shitstorm going. I say this as a techie Texan with a permanent WFH job who used the pandemic as an excuse to move out of the city. The small town I live near now has slowly transformed from a typical R-voting small Texas town to a purpleish LGBT friendlyish badass mixed community. We still voted for that stupid pee-baby Abbott, but change is definitely in the air…

  • BaronVonBort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, the refreshing feeling of seeing a headline from my local paper on a website and not being ashamed of what it says.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rafael also has preferred pronouns. If we aren’t allowed to use people’s preferred pronouns, do we start referring to Rafael as Rafael instead of he/him?

    I can’t wait for some dipshit to reply to this thinking I actually believe this bill prevents you from using pronouns

    • Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Rafael” is also a preferred name. So we better just start referring to the piece of shit descriptively.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the entire Senate should just start to only ever refer to him as Rafael.

      But intentionally mispronounce it “ruh-FAIL”.

      And when he inevitably gets bent out of shape over it, tell him to sit down and let the grown ups talk.

  • vitamin@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is just performative nonsense. It has no chance of passing. But Rafael Cruz just has to let the most fucked up segment of the Republican base know that he on their side!

  • RepulsiveDog4415@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, Ted isn’t even one of his names? Of all the names in the world he choose to go with Ted? No disrespect against anyone named Ted but there are cooler names out there…

  • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    For those wondering:

    “Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, legally named Rafael Edward Cruz, has introduced a bill in the U.S. Senate titled the Safeguarding Honest Speech Act. The legislation proposes prohibiting federal funds from enforcing policies requiring federal employees to use preferred pronouns or names other than an individual’s legal name”

    • money_loo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So he just wants to stop the federal government from enforcing pronouns or aliases in government settings…?

      When does the government actually FORCE or ENFORCE pronoun usage though, using government money?

      Am I taking crazy pills or is he just making shit up?

      *Just wanted to say I appreciate all the people replying, the implications of his bill may be more severe than I initially read into it.

      • DrPop@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        Currently the federal government has to respect an employees preferred name and pronouns by law. This would be a violation of individuals rights but when did they ever care about rights.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          What is the act or bill or whatever this was passed in? And is it a recent thing?

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Legally, if I tell the government to call me by X name and use Y pronouns, they must respect it.

        Rapheal “loves-the-feeling-of-freshly-pissed-pants” Cruz, or as he is most commonly known, Piss Pants Cruz, doesnt like mandating respect for an individuals preferred form of address.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, this is classic fascist double-speak. It’s meant to make you feel like you’re taking crazy pills, unless your brain has already been rewired by fascist propaganda.

  • iegod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How does anyone (who doesn’t already realize what’s up) not realize the absolute absurdity of what’s going on. Like wtf. Pronouns causing problems? Better fucking LEGISLATE it. Like what? The fuck.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Conservative media has been boiling the frog on culture wars since Nixon, and by design.

      No one who listens to right wing drivel realizes the absurdity because their version of politics is like football to them: a game to win with the only real consequence being their ability to shove it in people’s faces, or shoved in back in theirs.

      Conservative media is designed to be that so it is trivially easy to hide actual unfavorable news from their viewers, like $14 billion disappearing over night into Isreal or their god king standing trial on actual, provable charges.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well a lot of misinformed people think his existence is a good thing but in reality he’s harmful to (amongst other things) the vaginal health of women so yeah, calling him a douche is fitting.

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Kind of true. This is what the bill says:

      “No Federal funds may be used for the purpose of implementing, administering, or enforcing any rule…requiring an employee or contractor of any Federal agency or Department to use—(1) another person’s preferred pronouns if they are incompatible with such person’s sex; or (2) a name other than a person’s legal name when referring to such person.”

      I interpret this to be an attempt to remove any training materials, HR efforts, or resolution conflict mediators from mentioning anything about gender pronouns. The creation of any training documents or resolving any interpersonal conflict where a person calls someone by a name other than their preferred name would be strictly off limits since that time would be paid for by the government. It doesn’t matter if there’s a concrete rule requiring others to respect preferred pronouns or not. If someone is upset about another person disrespecting preferred pronouns, this bill is broadly worded enough that nothing can be done about it. It creates a loophole for a bad actor to harrass someone with impunity.

      This “protects” a harrasser’s right to free speech in the same way it protects Nazis from gathering to protest and promote racism. Protecting free speech sounds good on paper until you delve deeper into the implications. Namely, removing limitations on hate speech in order to further suppress others. This bill is not hypocritical, as at first thought, but it is still just what you’d expect from the GOP.

  • jimbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just remember, as stupid as stunts like this are, there are stupider people who eat it up.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. Enrich the ruling class as much as possible.
      2. Widen the class divide as much as possible.
      3. Eliminate the social safety net to curtail class mobility as much as possible.

      Anything else that happens is merely incidental.